References in Risk as feelings

reference : Risk as feelings

JSON YAML text HTML Turtle N-Triples JSON Triples RDF+XML RDF+JSON Graphviz SVG
/report/usgcrp-climate-human-health-assessment-2016/reference/ca70d728-88f3-44ae-aa3b-e67710ea350b

This bibliographic record appears in :

chapter

report

chapter

report

finding

Reference URIs:

Publication/contributor :

article

Bibliographic fields
reftype	Journal Article
Abstract	Virtually all current theories of choice under risk or uncertainty are cognitive and consequentialist. They assume that people assess the desirability and likelihood of possible outcomes of choice alternatives and integrate this information through some type of expectation-based calculus to arrive at a decision. The authors propose an alternative theoretical perspective, the risk-as-feelings hypothesis, that highlights the role of affect experienced at the moment of decision making. Drawing on research from clinical, physiological, and other subfields of psychology, they show that emotional reactions to risky situations often diverge from cognitive assessments of those risks. When such divergence occurs, emotional reactions often drive behavior. The risk-as-feelings hypothesis is shown to explain a wide range of phenomena that have resisted interpretation in cognitiveâconsequentialist terms. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
Author	Loewenstein, George F. Weber, Elke U. Hsee, Christopher K. Welch, Ned
DOI	10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.267
ISSN	1939-1455
Issue	2
Journal	Psychological Bulletin
Keywords	Choice Behavior Decision Making Emotional Responses Risk Assessment Uncertainty
Pages	267-286
Place Published	US
Title	Risk as feelings
Volume	127
Year	2001

Bibliographic identifiers
.place_published	US
.publisher	American Psychological Association
.reference_type	0
_chapter	["Ch. 26: Decision Support FINAL"]
_record_number	4463
_uuid	ca70d728-88f3-44ae-aa3b-e67710ea350b